From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 20 17:55:09 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33E63106566B; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 17:55:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from glarkin@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail1.sourcehosting.net (mail1.sourcehosting.net [74.205.51.45]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9A248FC08; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 17:55:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 68-189-245-235.dhcp.oxfr.ma.charter.com ([68.189.245.235] helo=cube.entropy.prv) by mail1.sourcehosting.net with esmtp (Exim 4.73 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1RGwIf-00082q-8u; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 13:21:07 -0400 Received: from v104.entropy.prv (v104.entropy.prv [192.168.1.104]) by cube.entropy.prv (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6CE753FDF4C; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 13:21:01 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4EA0587C.6080703@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 13:21:00 -0400 From: Greg Larkin Organization: The FreeBSD Project User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.23) Gecko/20110920 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.15 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alexey Dokuchaev References: <201110201222.p9KCM3ed032529@repoman.freebsd.org> <20111020161141.GA52260@FreeBSD.org> <20111020164208.GA55813@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20111020164208.GA55813@FreeBSD.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 OpenPGP: id=1C940290 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 68.189.245.235 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: glarkin@FreeBSD.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on mail1.sourcehosting.net X-Spam-Level: *** X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_PBL, RCVD_IN_RP_RNBL, RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL, RDNS_DYNAMIC, TVD_RCVD_IP autolearn=no version=3.3.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail1.sourcehosting.net) Cc: cvs-ports@freebsd.org, Eitan Adler , cvs-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/security Makefile ports/security/py-htpasswd Makefile distinfo pkg-descr X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: glarkin@FreeBSD.org List-Id: **OBSOLETE** CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 17:55:09 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 10/20/11 12:42 PM, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 12:27:13PM -0400, Eitan Adler wrote: >> 2011/10/20 Alexey Dokuchaev : >>> On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 12:22:03PM +0000, Eitan Adler wrote: >>>> eadler 2011-10-20 12:22:03 UTC >>>> >>>> Modified files: >>>> security Makefile >>>> Added files: >>>> security/py-htpasswd Makefile distinfo pkg-descr >>>> Log: >>>> Replacement for htpasswd. >>>> >>>> This port will install htpasswd.py that can be found in trac contrib >>>> directory. >>> >>> Yet again, :-) I have to reiterate that for *utilities* (contrary to >>> modules, extensions, and plugins) language prefix is redundant and should >>> not be part of the port directory and package name, especially since there >>> is no `security/htpasswd' port to conflict with. >> >> This is a replacement for the "real" htpasswd and specifically did not >> want to use htpasswd as a port name. Furthermore this script is installed >> as htpasswd.py and not htpasswd. If you have a better suggestion I'll >> take it. > > I did not say anything about the script name; I understand perfectly that > .py suffix here allows it to coexist peacefully with whatever htpasswd might > be installed by users' favorite web server. > > Moreover, this little utility might be a bit special since its pythonic > nature probably should be reitereated for good reasons. However, given > that many ports that do not warrant this naming are being committed in a > similar fashion, my primary concern was to raise the point that such > decisions should be carefully thought out and backed up by sufficient > reasoning. > > ./danfe Quick question here - www/trac already installs htpasswd.py into its EXAMPLESDIR, so is this port necessary? Of course, examples are optional, but if someone wanted htpasswd.py, couldn't they just reinstall www/trac if the script isn't already present? Regards, Greg - -- Greg Larkin http://www.FreeBSD.org/ - The Power To Serve http://www.sourcehosting.net/ - Ready. Set. Code. http://twitter.com/cpucycle/ - Follow you, follow me -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk6gWHwACgkQ0sRouByUApAsXgCdHemdwCOnqhAhTtRk5K1FRagE qJUAn1k5a/Lq2kKDK0myfD7qJtfvu8VU =GXkd -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----