Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 08:24:50 +0200 From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> To: Pawel Jakub Dawidek <nick@garage.freebsd.pl> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pam_unix.c [PATCH]. Message-ID: <xzp65nuclsd.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> In-Reply-To: <20030528214651.GK45118@garage.freebsd.pl> (Pawel Jakub Dawidek's message of "Wed, 28 May 2003 23:46:51 %2B0200") References: <20030528214651.GK45118@garage.freebsd.pl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Pawel Jakub Dawidek <nick@garage.freebsd.pl> writes: > I think there is no need to open a PR for this. > Argument 'flags' marked as unused is used in those functions: Yeah. It shouldn't be, though, pretty much everyone (including the Sun engineers in charge of PAM) agrees that PAM_DISALLOW_NULL_AUTHTOK is evil and should go away. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzp65nuclsd.fsf>