From owner-freebsd-current Fri Oct 18 14:33: 1 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90FC837B401; Fri, 18 Oct 2002 14:32:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from falcon.mail.pas.earthlink.net (falcon.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.74]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D6B543EF2; Fri, 18 Oct 2002 14:32:59 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tlambert2@mindspring.com) Received: from pool0209.cvx21-bradley.dialup.earthlink.net ([209.179.192.209] helo=mindspring.com) by falcon.mail.pas.earthlink.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 182ejh-0003Ks-00; Fri, 18 Oct 2002 14:32:49 -0700 Message-ID: <3DB07DBA.57DBA165@mindspring.com> Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2002 14:31:38 -0700 From: Terry Lambert X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kent Stewart Cc: Will Andrews , Scott Long , current@FreeBSD.ORG, ports@FreeBSD.ORG, dirk@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cdrtools doesn't build on -current References: <20021018073701.GA71980@hollin.btc.adaptec.com> <20021018210201.GJ19874@procyon.firepipe.net> <3DB07B3B.3090907@owt.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Kent Stewart wrote: > In 40 years of using computers, nothing has changed. The system's > people are still primadona's and do nothing wrong. > > Get used to it :). Unfortunately!! People don't install OSes because > of the OS as much as the codes they can run on it. The importance tree > is inverted. The people that think they are the most important are > only there to provide improved tools to the people that users depend on. Standards compliance changes, in theory, are for the benefit to "the people that users depend upon". All other systems changes are pretty much gratuitous, unless they are to support hardware and/org add features. When Mike Smith first implemented ACPI, he got enough shit to push him out of the project; but it's damn cool that, on systems where it works, I can hit the power button, and the machine will gracefully shut itself down. If it's unfair to make certain changes (it is), then it's also unfair to bitch about certain changes (it is). Moving towards standards compliance will break all the places there are workarounds to standards non-compliance. You could therefore equally argue that these should be seperated out in the patches in ports, to ensure that "sudden compliance with standards" never broke anything. Yeah, there has been some primadona behaviour with architectural changes whose only compatability was whether or not the change was enabled with a kernel option. But the glove fits both parties, too. -- Terry To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message