Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 22:47:01 -0500 From: Craig Boston <craig@xfoil.gank.org> To: ticso@cicely.de, Bernd Walter <ticso@cicely12.cicely.de>, Josef Karthauser <joe@FreeBSD.org>, current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: CardBus USB 2.0 Controller (NEC uPD) Message-ID: <200306112247.01397.craig@xfoil.gank.org> In-Reply-To: <20030612002139.GT26807@cicely12.cicely.de> References: <1055260269.91337.127.camel@owen1492.uf.corelab.com> <20030611224538.GB10822@genius.tao.org.uk> <20030612002139.GT26807@cicely12.cicely.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wednesday 11 June 2003 07:21 pm, Bernd Walter wrote: > On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 11:45:38PM +0100, Josef Karthauser wrote: > > The detach code could be made to work fairly easily. It's mostly there > > I believe, but disabled. Nick couldn't convince himself that all the > > used memory was being returned if the device is suddently unloaded. You > > could suck it and see. > > I'm not shure if the code would work, but it was also ported into ehci > and therefor ehci should be in a similar state. > Well loosing memory is better than panic. > I have no cardbus - can this be tested with a module? I'd be more than happy to give it a shot on my now-working cardbus card and see what happens. It is as simple as adding DEVMETHOD(device_detach, ohci_pci_detach) to the device_method_t ? Craig
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200306112247.01397.craig>