From owner-freebsd-ruby@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 20 00:23:51 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ruby@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C90F106566B; Sat, 20 Aug 2011 00:23:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steve@mouf.net) Received: from mouf.net (mouf.net [204.109.58.86]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A6C68FC13; Sat, 20 Aug 2011 00:23:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from meatwad.mouf.net (cpe-065-190-149-241.nc.res.rr.com [65.190.149.241]) (authenticated bits=0) by mouf.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p7K09WSq011120 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 19 Aug 2011 20:09:32 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from steve@mouf.net) Message-ID: <4E4EFB3C.8040705@mouf.net> Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 20:09:32 -0400 From: Steve Wills User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110531 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stanislav Sedov , dinoex@FreeBSD.org, clsung@FreeBSD.org, Philip Gollucci , wen@FreeBSD.org, avl@FreeBSD.org X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.6 (mouf.net [204.109.58.86]); Fri, 19 Aug 2011 20:09:33 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.96.2 at mouf.net X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: ruby@FreeBSD.org Subject: Ruby 1.9 this weekend X-BeenThere: freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD-specific Ruby discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2011 00:23:51 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I'm mailing you because you are listed as part of the ruby@ team on http://wiki.freebsd.org/Ruby. The last exp-run of my patch to make Ruby 1.9 default was very clean. There are still a good number of ports that are marked as broken with 1.9, but none too critical as far as I can tell. Unless there are objections, I plan to go ahead and commit my patch to make 1.9 the default this time tomorrow. Once it's committed, I'll keep an eye on lists and bug reports to catch anything I might have missed. What say you? Silence will be taken as acceptance. :) Thanks, Steve -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJOTvs7AAoJEPXPYrMgexuh8tMIAJwkX7PrBxWXGpzalWOcbH+R Bk5zNZgIlU2f+hn9Lx2U4/GHW62yRqbeKyvYS7dt1/5mbaVBB9Cb3N+IECpvdyRd aPCTqJpjTtrpHwio3Bw1Q3WR15S+YSfns3xE9Dqi3TABjF7TottjvWDqR3qkJikv CGZrNSOMTXsaW20hTvS6PSG54pNvHGpK0ijAIgTvK84W8lv62cjGEvKgXQdwTsv6 yeJV+AuBJCJWtAYtJlxQBXarnt8ySuS0uNs413kQwl2yt8yLfTiYQkBu/xJv6Gdh 6EkJh0ZvrLc6iI+PO7Hq6vwKmq+EUpFIwqcHsoGnijgrR5CFiszrtJ51Ru6fshE= =DrAo -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----