Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 3 Oct 2003 18:54:04 -0700
From:      Will Andrews <will@csociety.org>
To:        Barney Wolff <barney@databus.com>
Cc:        current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: [security-advisories@freebsd.org: [FreeBSD-Announce] FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-03:17.procfs]
Message-ID:  <20031004015404.GW72999@procyon.firepipe.net>
In-Reply-To: <20031004014527.GB32411@pit.databus.com>
References:  <20031004014527.GB32411@pit.databus.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 09:45:27PM -0400, Barney Wolff wrote:
> I'm finally motivated to ask, why don't security advisories contain
> the equivalent revs for -head?  Surely I can't be the only person
> following -current who doesn't build every day.

Simply because the SO does not support -CURRENT.

Regards,
-- 
wca



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031004015404.GW72999>