Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2010 23:41:38 +1000 From: Lawrence Stewart <lstewart@freebsd.org> To: Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd@FreeBSD.org> Cc: svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r209119 - head/sys/sys Message-ID: <4C14E012.7080902@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20100613101025.GD1320@garage.freebsd.pl> References: <201006130239.o5D2du3m086332@svn.freebsd.org> <20100613101025.GD1320@garage.freebsd.pl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 06/13/10 20:10, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: > On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 02:39:55AM +0000, Lawrence Stewart wrote: >> Author: lstewart >> Date: Sun Jun 13 02:39:55 2010 >> New Revision: 209119 >> URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/209119 >> >> Log: >> Add a utility macro to simplify calculating an aggregate sum from a DPCPU >> counter variable. >> >> Sponsored by: FreeBSD Foundation >> Reviewed by: jhb, rpaulo, rwatson (previous version of patch) >> MFC after: 1 week >> >> Modified: >> head/sys/sys/pcpu.h >> >> Modified: head/sys/sys/pcpu.h >> ============================================================================== >> --- head/sys/sys/pcpu.h Sun Jun 13 01:27:29 2010 (r209118) >> +++ head/sys/sys/pcpu.h Sun Jun 13 02:39:55 2010 (r209119) >> @@ -106,6 +106,17 @@ extern uintptr_t dpcpu_off[]; >> #define DPCPU_ID_GET(i, n) (*DPCPU_ID_PTR(i, n)) >> #define DPCPU_ID_SET(i, n, v) (*DPCPU_ID_PTR(i, n) = v) >> >> +/* >> + * Utility macros. >> + */ >> +#define DPCPU_SUM(n, var, sum) \ >> +do { \ >> + (sum) = 0; \ >> + u_int i; \ >> + CPU_FOREACH(i) \ >> + (sum) += (DPCPU_ID_PTR(i, n))->var; \ >> +} while (0) > > I'd suggest first swapping variable declaration and '(sum) = 0;'. Can do (will wait until consensus on other issues is reached first before tweaking though). > Also using 'i' as a counter in macro can easly lead to name collision. I had a similar concern but after chatting with John on IRC felt it wasn't such a big deal in this case. > If you need to do it, I'd suggest '_i' or something. Could do... is it worth it? > Maybe it would be better to make it an inline function rather than macro? Inlining it could be annoying with respect to the types used in the function prototype, no? I suspect it would be more useful keeping it as a macro if possible. Cheers, Lawrence
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4C14E012.7080902>