Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 14:16:36 -0500 (EST) From: Daniel Eischen <eischen@vigrid.com> To: Craig Rodrigues <rodrigc@crodrigues.org> Cc: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Should ps -p list threads? Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10402121408350.5277-100000@pcnet5.pcnet.com> In-Reply-To: <20040212171101.GA72641@crodrigues.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 12 Feb 2004, Craig Rodrigues wrote: > On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 11:16:57AM -0500, Daniel Eischen wrote: > > But 'ps' without -H seems to display KSEs where it shouldn't. > > I looked in the source code of ps, > specifically in src/bin/ps/ps.c [ ... ] > > So, I am not sure if this is a bug in kvm_getprocs() or in ps.c, > but the result is that if you type ps or ps -H, they > both display KSEs. Probably just typing ps should not display > them. > > Any idea what the problem is? We currently lack a sysctl interface to get finer-grained process info. I think KERN_PROC_THREADS (or whatever) should be added as a flag to the sysctl, so that you can 'or' it in to 'op' of kvm_getprocs(). You would need some kernel changes to support it too. I can look at it when I get a chance. -- Dan Eischen
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.4.10.10402121408350.5277-100000>