From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 25 20:27:30 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 017FEDBB for ; Sun, 25 May 2014 20:27:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailhost.netlab.sk (mailhost.netlab.sk [84.245.65.10]) (using SSLv3 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 73AAE2EBD for ; Sun, 25 May 2014 20:27:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from zeta.dino.sk (fw1.dino.sk [84.245.95.252]) (AUTH: LOGIN milan) by mailhost.netlab.sk with ESMTPA; Sun, 25 May 2014 22:27:30 +0200 id 005080BA.53825232.000156A6 Date: Sun, 25 May 2014 22:27:26 +0200 From: Milan Obuch To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mail/courier build failures on newer FreeBSD versions Message-ID: <20140525222726.47261ae9@zeta.dino.sk> In-Reply-To: <20140525201008.GQ2341@home.opsec.eu> References: <20140525213854.0d952d1d@zeta.dino.sk> <20140525201008.GQ2341@home.opsec.eu> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.3 (GTK+ 2.24.22; i386-portbld-freebsd10.0) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 May 2014 20:27:30 -0000 On Sun, 25 May 2014 22:10:08 +0200 Kurt Jaeger wrote: > Hi! > > > In the mean time, could someone review PR ports/190209 which > > addresses this issue > > (http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=190209)? It is really > > simple and should solve package builder failures for [REL - > > 10i386-default], [REL - 10amd64-default], [REL - 10i386-quarterly], > > [REL - 10amd64-quarterly], [REL - head-i386-default] and [REL - > > head-amd64-default]. > > The commit system rejects ports which are still unstaged, so we > we need a patch which also addresses staging. > > As far as I understand, you are the maintainer ? > Yes, I just use unique addresses for mailing lists... Patch for stage is in works, but as mail/courier is a complex port, I need to investigate various cases. Currently I work on pkg-plist, and some questions will come, I am sure. I just do not like to submit uncomplete work, and patch mentioned solves the other issue, and being simple... Regards, Milan