From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun May 25 20:43:14 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB76C479
 for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Sun, 25 May 2014 20:43:14 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7150A2047
 for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Sun, 25 May 2014 20:43:14 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.82 (FreeBSD))
 (envelope-from <lists@opsec.eu>)
 id 1WofGE-000BO7-Ur; Sun, 25 May 2014 22:43:14 +0200
Date: Sun, 25 May 2014 22:43:14 +0200
From: Kurt Jaeger <lists@opsec.eu>
To: Milan Obuch <freebsd-ports@dino.sk>
Subject: Re: mail/courier build failures on newer FreeBSD versions
Message-ID: <20140525204314.GR2341@home.opsec.eu>
References: <20140525213854.0d952d1d@zeta.dino.sk>
 <20140525201008.GQ2341@home.opsec.eu>
 <20140525222726.47261ae9@zeta.dino.sk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20140525222726.47261ae9@zeta.dino.sk>
Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 May 2014 20:43:14 -0000

Hi!

> > > In the mean time, could someone review PR ports/190209 which
> > > addresses this issue
> > > (http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=190209)? It is really
> > > simple and should solve package builder failures for [REL -
> > > 10i386-default], [REL - 10amd64-default], [REL - 10i386-quarterly],
> > > [REL - 10amd64-quarterly], [REL - head-i386-default] and [REL -
> > > head-amd64-default].
> > 
> > The commit system rejects ports which are still unstaged, so we
> > we need a patch which also addresses staging.

> > As far as I understand, you are the maintainer ?

> Yes, I just use unique addresses for mailing lists...
> 
> Patch for stage is in works, but as mail/courier is a complex port, I
> need to investigate various cases. Currently I work on pkg-plist, and
> some questions will come, I am sure.

Do you also plan to upgrade to 0.73. ? With 0.65 we're badly behind
the times, aren't we ?

> I just do not like to submit uncomplete work, and patch mentioned
> solves the other issue, and being simple...

Well, I have a patch for eclipse-devel, which is not accepted,
because it's not staged either. So I'm in the same situation 8-}

-- 
pi@opsec.eu            +49 171 3101372                         6 years to go !