Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 00:12:22 +0200 From: Tilman Linneweh <arved@FreeBSD.org> To: Jens Rehsack <rehsack@liwing.de> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: A different approach for the ghostscript problem (was: Re: [PATCH] ***** enable choose of ghostscript interpreter) Message-ID: <20030727221222.GA93833@huckfinn.arved.de> Resent-Message-ID: <200307272222.h6RMMid7094274@huckfinn.arved.de> In-Reply-To: <200307272105.h6RL5BTo000730@helo.liwing.de> References: <200307272105.h6RL5BTo000730@helo.liwing.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--azLHFNyN32YCQGCU Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline * Jens Rehsack [So, 27 Jul 2003 at 23:59 GMT]: >>Description: > This patch allows the admin of the machine to choose either > print/ghostscript-gnu or print/ghostscript-afpl Just picking a random PR. Instead of adding knobs to every port, a more generic solution might be appropriate, e.g. a bsd.port.mk patch. Oh, and I am not the first one with this idea. PR 36112 by lev tries to introduce a IMHO better solution. regards tilman --azLHFNyN32YCQGCU Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/JE5FfCLDn4B6xToRArk/AJ9FRiqWk7D/jIelMjdvVvHvaArYpwCeIrXn w6j5wDIaOl2vyp3hWV4+Hpg= =zzbt -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --azLHFNyN32YCQGCU--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030727221222.GA93833>