From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 25 21:19:55 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6FF75DF9 for ; Sun, 25 May 2014 21:19:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 271A822A9 for ; Sun, 25 May 2014 21:19:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.82 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Wofpj-000BS9-Op; Sun, 25 May 2014 23:19:55 +0200 Date: Sun, 25 May 2014 23:19:55 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Milan Obuch Subject: Re: mail/courier build failures on newer FreeBSD versions Message-ID: <20140525211955.GT2341@home.opsec.eu> References: <20140525213854.0d952d1d@zeta.dino.sk> <20140525201008.GQ2341@home.opsec.eu> <20140525222726.47261ae9@zeta.dino.sk> <20140525204314.GR2341@home.opsec.eu> <20140525225151.227ea602@zeta.dino.sk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140525225151.227ea602@zeta.dino.sk> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 May 2014 21:19:55 -0000 Hi! > > Do you also plan to upgrade to 0.73. ? With 0.65 we're badly behind > > the times, aren't we ? > Yes, this upgrade is long due, but it has some issues too. What issues does 0.73.1 have ? Is there a list somewhere ? Frankly, courier looses more and more marketshare, as can be seen on http://openemailsurvey.org Which features are available on courier which are not provided by other MTAs ? -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 6 years to go !