Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 14 Jul 1999 17:58:07 -0700
From:      "David Schwartz" <davids@webmaster.com>
To:        "Brett Glass" <brett@lariat.org>
Cc:        <freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG>, <advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject:   RE: NT vs Linux vs FreeBSD
Message-ID:  <000001bece5d$1a099ab0$021d85d1@youwant.to>
In-Reply-To: <4.2.0.58.19990714182909.045589a0@localhost>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help

	Regardless, two FreeBSD-3.2 machines running different 'distributions' are
probably going to be a lot more alike than two Linux-2.0.36 machines running
different distributions.

	My belief is that this is both a good thing and a bad thing. This is simply
another area where Linux and FreeBSD differ. Each operating system's
respective adovcates will be happy to sing the praises of their operating
system's respective choices and complain about other operating system's
choices.

	David Schwartz

Check your NTP server:
http://www.gpsclock.com/check.html

> FreeBSD isn't a "one-distribution" OS. To say so would be to gloss over
> the difference between the distributions that are available, and also
> to suggest that the OS was so unpopular as not to be worthy of multiple
> distributions.
[SNIP]
> Exactly. Just as Red Hat, Caldera, etc. have different distributions of
> Linux that contain the same Linux kernel, there are different
> distributions
> of FreeBSD with the same versions of the kernel, etc.
>
> --Brett



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?000001bece5d$1a099ab0$021d85d1>