Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 20:36:05 -0700 From: Eitan Adler <eadler@freebsd.org> To: araujo@freebsd.org Cc: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org>, miwi@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org, Dmitry Sivachenko <demon@freebsd.org>, cvs-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/net/haproxy Makefile distinfo Message-ID: <CAF6rxgmvOGkdNDvwFREywFF1aAC_xQNm4qB_DbELAqnotZPJog@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAOfEmZjGrbCiMDFuRt-wFk03HPmpvsDvm9Jn1uA14paQ_1vzqQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <201205210632.q4L6WPI9081702@repoman.freebsd.org> <20120521143623.34087c13.miwi@FreeBSD.org> <4FB9E411.9030500@FreeBSD.org> <20120521070444.GG63744@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <CAOfEmZgqf_F-FuYE2t_5bhjcQB-roGYO8LCuX6yynh_oieBtww@mail.gmail.com> <CAF6rxgkvwf5MGLsTVfksO-vQoc4OK9x094SDUHXWkDWoedCO_g@mail.gmail.com> <CAOfEmZjV3d4O2LTsJTLM9kh97QcRGx9RokEDz-YGxb5wSz6Pdg@mail.gmail.com> <CAF6rxgkJ4McR=2ESxeGc3m03q8iAoJfAMhRyR4v3hjL4HzWdfg@mail.gmail.com> <CAOfEmZj5sQJtCk6xqdQuSjejN453MDqws-Wn-gnMSk1=7HR8RA@mail.gmail.com> <CAF6rxgk=vC0sqU6Lk=nSM_FSc38txiq3=nWb9EVp6YFy1Vk1VQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAOfEmZjGrbCiMDFuRt-wFk03HPmpvsDvm9Jn1uA14paQ_1vzqQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 24 May 2012 20:32, Marcelo Araujo <araujobsdport@gmail.com> wrote: > Well, we are talking specifically in the case of haproxy. It doesn't break > anything right, does it? > So, I do believe there is no problem with that commit. Agreed. I was just giving a rationale for why approval is still required ;) -- Eitan Adler Source & Ports committer X11, Bugbusting teams
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAF6rxgmvOGkdNDvwFREywFF1aAC_xQNm4qB_DbELAqnotZPJog>