From owner-svn-src-all@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 20:15:42 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A96C7B2; Wed, 30 Jul 2014 20:15:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.fgznet.ch (mail.fgznet.ch [81.92.96.47]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 339E92FF7; Wed, 30 Jul 2014 20:15:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.225.11] (dhclient-91-190-14-19.flashcable.ch [91.190.14.19]) by smtp.fgznet.ch (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit_SMTPAUTH) with ESMTP id s6UKFXV7057579; Wed, 30 Jul 2014 22:15:36 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from andreast@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <53D95265.9010406@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 22:15:33 +0200 From: Andreas Tobler User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alan Cox , Alan Cox , src-committers@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r269134 - head/sys/vm References: <201407261810.s6QIAIIj049439@svn.freebsd.org> <53D9406A.3060101@FreeBSD.org> <53D94BAF.8050102@rice.edu> <53D94D73.3050808@rice.edu> In-Reply-To: <53D94D73.3050808@rice.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.64 on 81.92.96.47 X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 20:15:42 -0000 On 30.07.14 21:54, Alan Cox wrote: > On 07/30/2014 14:46, Alan Cox wrote: >> On 07/30/2014 13:58, Andreas Tobler wrote: >>> Hi Alan, >>> >>> On 26.07.14 20:10, Alan Cox wrote: >>>> Author: alc >>>> Date: Sat Jul 26 18:10:18 2014 >>>> New Revision: 269134 >>>> URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/269134 >>>> >>>> Log: >>>> When unwiring a region of an address space, do not assume that the >>>> underlying physical pages are mapped by the pmap. If, for >>>> example, the >>>> application has performed an mprotect(..., PROT_NONE) on any part >>>> of the >>>> wired region, then those pages will no longer be mapped by the pmap. >>>> So, using the pmap to lookup the wired pages in order to unwire them >>>> doesn't always work, and when it doesn't work wired pages are leaked. >>>> >>>> To avoid the leak, introduce and use a new function >>>> vm_object_unwire() >>>> that locates the wired pages by traversing the object and its backing >>>> objects. >>>> >>>> At the same time, switch from using pmap_change_wiring() to the >>>> recently >>>> introduced function pmap_unwire() for unwiring the region's mappings. >>>> pmap_unwire() is faster, because it operates a range of virtual >>>> addresses >>>> rather than a single virtual page at a time. Moreover, by >>>> operating on >>>> a range, it is superpage friendly. It doesn't waste time performing >>>> unnecessary demotions. >>>> >>>> Reported by: markj >>>> Reviewed by: kib >>>> Tested by: pho, jmg (arm) >>>> Sponsored by: EMC / Isilon Storage Division >>> This commit brings my 32- and 64-bit PowerMac's into panic. >>> Unfortunately I'm not able to give you a backtrace in the form of a >>> textdump nor of a core dump. >>> >>> The only thing I have is this picture: >>> >>> http://people.freebsd.org/~andreast/r269134_panic.jpg >>> >>> Exactly this revision gives a panic and breaks the textdump/coredump >>> facility. >>> >>> How can I help debugging? >>> >> It appears to me that moea64_pvo_enter() had a pre-existing bug that got >> tickled by this change. Specifically, moea64_pvo_enter() doesn't set >> the PVO_WIRED flag when an unwired mapping already exists. It just >> returns with the mapping still in an unwired state. Consequently, when >> pmap_unwire() finally runs, it doesn't find a wired mapping. >> >> Try this: >> >> Index: powerpc/aim/mmu_oea64.c >> =================================================================== >> --- powerpc/aim/mmu_oea64.c (revision 269127) >> +++ powerpc/aim/mmu_oea64.c (working copy) >> @@ -2274,7 +2274,8 @@ moea64_pvo_enter(mmu_t mmu, pmap_t pm, uma_zone_t >> if (pvo->pvo_pmap == pm && PVO_VADDR(pvo) == va) { >> if ((pvo->pvo_pte.lpte.pte_lo & LPTE_RPGN) == pa && >> (pvo->pvo_pte.lpte.pte_lo & (LPTE_NOEXEC | >> LPTE_PP)) >> - == (pte_lo & (LPTE_NOEXEC | LPTE_PP))) { >> + == (pte_lo & (LPTE_NOEXEC | LPTE_PP)) && >> + ((pvo->pvo_vaddr ^ flags) & PVO_WIRED)) { >> if (!(pvo->pvo_pte.lpte.pte_hi & >> LPTE_VALID)) { >> /* Re-insert if spilled */ >> i = MOEA64_PTE_INSERT(mmu, ptegidx, >> > > The new conditional test needs to be inverted. Try this instead: > > Index: powerpc/aim/mmu_oea64.c > =================================================================== > --- powerpc/aim/mmu_oea64.c (revision 269127) > +++ powerpc/aim/mmu_oea64.c (working copy) > @@ -2274,7 +2274,8 @@ moea64_pvo_enter(mmu_t mmu, pmap_t pm, uma_zone_t > if (pvo->pvo_pmap == pm && PVO_VADDR(pvo) == va) { > if ((pvo->pvo_pte.lpte.pte_lo & LPTE_RPGN) == pa && > (pvo->pvo_pte.lpte.pte_lo & (LPTE_NOEXEC | > LPTE_PP)) > - == (pte_lo & (LPTE_NOEXEC | LPTE_PP))) { > + == (pte_lo & (LPTE_NOEXEC | LPTE_PP)) && > + ((pvo->pvo_vaddr ^ flags) & PVO_WIRED) == 0) { > if (!(pvo->pvo_pte.lpte.pte_hi & > LPTE_VALID)) { > /* Re-insert if spilled */ > i = MOEA64_PTE_INSERT(mmu, ptegidx, > The panic stays, but the message is different: panic: moea64_pvo_to_pte: pvo 0x10147ea0 has invalid pte 0xb341180 in moea64_pteg_table but valid in pvo. Andreas