From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 29 07:07:49 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24E2216A4CE for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 07:07:49 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.butovo-online.ru (mail.b-o.ru [212.5.78.254]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D12A43D1D for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 07:07:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from resident@b-o.ru) Received: from [212.5.78.81] (helo=212.5.78.81) by mail.butovo-online.ru with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1Bq5CP-000FS7-CJ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 11:19:33 +0400 Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 11:09:43 +0400 From: Andrew Riabtsev X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.62i) Business X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <40658576.20040729110943@b-o.ru> To: Charlie Schluting In-Reply-To: <41081955.5090204@schluting.com> References: <41081955.5090204@schluting.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: packet order, ipf or ipfw X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Andrew Riabtsev List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 07:07:49 -0000 Hello Charlie, Thursday, July 29, 2004, 1:23:33 AM, you wrote: CS> So, what is the order, if I'm running ipf AND ipfw at the same time? CS> Will it work at all in this manner? Load both firewalls as modules, then you can be sure packets goes first through firewall you load first. And yes, this should works ok (ipf AND ipfw). -- Andrew mailto:resident@b-o.ru proud lvl 9 ubah haxor (http://www.try2hack.nl/levels/)