From owner-freebsd-mobile Tue Jun 5 0:13:19 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Received: from yog-sothoth.sgi.com (eugate.sgi.com [192.48.160.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F100737B405 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2001 00:13:14 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gwk@sgi.com) Received: from sgiger.munich.sgi.com (sgiger.munich.sgi.com [144.253.192.2]) by yog-sothoth.sgi.com (980305.SGI.8.8.8-aspam-6.2/980304.SGI-aspam-europe) via SMTP id JAA1495945; Tue, 5 Jun 2001 09:13:04 +0200 (CEST) mail_from (gwk@sgi.com) Received: from cuckoo.munich.sgi.com (cuckoo.munich.sgi.com [144.253.192.109]) by sgiger.munich.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/950213.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id JAA17889; Tue, 5 Jun 2001 09:12:59 +0200 Received: from hunter.munich.sgi.com ([192.82.201.204]) by cuckoo.munich.sgi.com (SGI-8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA84976; Tue, 5 Jun 2001 09:12:53 +0200 (CEST) Received: from hunter.munich.sgi.com (localhost.munich.sgi.com [127.0.0.1]) by hunter.munich.sgi.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f557CJs01068; Tue, 5 Jun 2001 00:12:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gwk@sgi.com) Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2001 00:12:19 -0700 Message-ID: From: "Georg-W. Koltermann" To: Gordon Tetlow Cc: Erick Kinnee , Subject: Re: Xircom RealPort Cardbus Ethernet 10/100+Modem 56 In-Reply-To: References: User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.4.1 (Stand By Me) SEMI/1.13.7 (Awazu) FLIM/1.13.2 (Kasanui) Emacs/20.7 (i386--freebsd) MULE/4.0 (HANANOEN) Organization: SGI X-Attribution: gwk MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.13.7 - "Awazu") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org At Mon, 4 Jun 2001 02:24:09 -0700 (PDT), Gordon Tetlow wrote: > > [...] > duplex mismatch? Cisco's are notorious for totally botching > autonegotiation. Other than that, I was under the impression that the CBEM > was the same as the RBEM just in a different packaging. Could be wrong > though. How would I be able to verify or even fix duplex mismatch? I tried both letting the card autoconfigure and setting it do 100 Mb full duplex with no apparent difference. The CISCO port is set to auto as my network support tells me. Should I have them set the CISCO to a fixed configuration? -- Regards, Georg. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Who in the world needs 2000 Windows? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-mobile" in the body of the message