From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 3 06:13:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5B55106564A for ; Sat, 3 Jul 2010 06:13:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aiza21@comclark.com) Received: from avmxsmtp3.comclark.com (avmxsmtp3.comclark.com [202.69.191.117]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53D928FC16 for ; Sat, 3 Jul 2010 06:13:14 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AiUdAAdyLkzKRa3YOWdsb2JhbAAHh2eYBAEBAQE0ASe+Y4UkBINyhnk X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.53,529,1272816000"; d="scan'208,223";a="7063469" Received: from unknown (HELO [10.0.10.3]) ([202.69.173.216]) by avmxsmtp2.comclark.com with ESMTP; 03 Jul 2010 14:13:14 +0800 Message-ID: <4C2ED4F9.2010408@comclark.com> Date: Sat, 03 Jul 2010 14:13:13 +0800 From: Aiza User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "questions@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Subject: jail and uname X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Jul 2010 06:13:15 -0000 From the console of a jail I issue uname –r and get 8.0-RELEASE-p3, which is the release level of the host. I know the jail is running a pristine minimum install of 8.0-RELEASE. I would think issuing uname from within a jail environment should respond with the info of the jail environment. Is this not a security violation?