Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 1 Feb 2005 23:34:04 +0100
From:      Bernd Walter <ticso@cicely12.cicely.de>
To:        John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/sys/alpha/alpha machdep.c src/sys/alpha/include cpuconf.h src/sys/alpha/pci lca.c lcareg.h
Message-ID:  <20050201223403.GE31822@cicely12.cicely.de>
In-Reply-To: <200502011132.13288.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <200501312307.j0VN7gxm080740@repoman.freebsd.org> <200502010649.33768.jhb@FreeBSD.org> <20050201152803.GC31822@cicely12.cicely.de> <200502011132.13288.jhb@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 11:32:13AM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Tuesday 01 February 2005 10:28 am, Bernd Walter wrote:
> > Would the PAL call work for SMP systems?
> 
> Yes, though it says that the CPU counter can slow down while it is in the 
> waiting state, so it seems that PAL is free to implement something just like 
> what you did.

I'm more worried about wakeup e.g. in case of one CPU releasing a lock
another is waiting for.

> > AFAIK no alpha CPU has native halt support so there is not much magic
> > that PAL can do for us.
> > What I've found out about this case is that alpha CPUs automaticaly
> > reduce power on unused parts and running just a tight loop, that works
> > without memory access, for a few microsecsonds might be more efficient
> > do do it ourself than calling PAL, which must be doing something
> > similar.
> > At least I think it is possible to reduce idle power consumption from
> > the current situation either way.
> 
> Yes, right now we buzz loop with a memory access on each iteration, we could 
> add a for loop that just decrements a counter to zero to the idle loop if 
> desired.  With preemption turned on we could have the idle process not check 
> the run queues at all and just sit in a buzz loop.

Exactly this is what I was thinking about, but wanted to do power
measurements first.
But my priority has more interessting stuff first - the lca code
already existed for years now.

-- 
B.Walter                   BWCT                http://www.bwct.de
bernd@bwct.de                                  info@bwct.de



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050201223403.GE31822>