From owner-freebsd-current  Tue Jan  9 12:59:56 1996
Return-Path: owner-current
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id MAA06004
          for current-outgoing; Tue, 9 Jan 1996 12:59:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from forgery.CS.Berkeley.EDU (forgery.CS.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.33.75])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id MAA05993
          for <current@freebsd.org>; Tue, 9 Jan 1996 12:59:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from asami@localhost) by forgery.CS.Berkeley.EDU (8.6.11/8.6.9) id MAA27091; Tue, 9 Jan 1996 12:59:15 -0800
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 1996 12:59:15 -0800
Message-Id: <199601092059.MAA27091@forgery.CS.Berkeley.EDU>
To: marino.ladavac@aut.alcatel.at
CC: current@freebsd.org
In-reply-to: <9601091256.AA22121@atuhc16.atusks01.aut.alcatel.at> (marino.ladavac@aut.alcatel.at)
Subject: Re: Prognosis of 2.2-960107-SNAP
From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami)
Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

 * > That person's gotta be one of the dumbest guys around, how can the
 * > "guarantee" threshold not be at 366?  Or am I totally misunderstanding
 * > the question? ;)
 * 
 * Becasue it's 367 :)

Well, that depends on the definition of "threshold".  I was thinking
in terms of "if it goes over this number, then...".

Satoshi (no, I haven't forgotten the leap year, that's why I said 366
         not 365 :)