Date: Fri, 16 Jan 1998 09:57:54 +0300 (MSK) From: =?KOI8-R?B?4c7E0sXKIP7F0s7P1w==?= <ache@nagual.pp.ru> To: Satoshi Asami <asami@cs.berkeley.edu> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: bsd.port.mk patch for review Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980116095255.21004B-100000@lsd.relcom.eu.net> In-Reply-To: <199801160620.WAA02177@bubble.didi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 15 Jan 1998, Satoshi Asami wrote: > Yes, we can certainly fix this in bsd.port.mk but I think this just > illustrates that it's patch that really needs to be fixed. Can we > tell POSIX to go fsck itself and make patch work the same on all > versions of FreeBSD? Different options and different behaviour are intentional move of patch maintainers and are well documented in patch(1), so we can't change it. Preferred variant will be bring patch 2.5 from -current to -stable, but since I not run -stable, I prefer somebody else to do MFC, could it be you? Then we can add -b to bsd.port.mk safely. -- Andrey A. Chernov <ache@nietzsche.net> http://www.nagual.pp.ru/~ache/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.980116095255.21004B-100000>