From owner-freebsd-ports Fri Sep 14 21:25:34 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from smtp.bmi.net (smtp.bmi.net [204.57.191.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E43D37B40C; Fri, 14 Sep 2001 21:25:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from johncoop.MSHOME (drumheller-router.bmi.net [206.63.201.3] (may be forged)) by smtp.bmi.net (Pro-8.9.3/Pro-8.9.3) with ESMTP id EAA04574; Sat, 15 Sep 2001 04:32:44 -0700 Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2001 21:25:24 -0700 From: John Merryweather Cooper To: sobomax@FreeBSD.org Cc: gnome@FreeBSD.org, ports@FreeBSD.org, asami@clickarray.com Subject: Re: bugbuddy build failure Message-ID: <20010914212524.A1124@johncoop.MSHOME> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: ; from sobomax@mail.ru on Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 21:04:18 -0700 X-Mailer: Balsa 1.1.7 Lines: 62 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On 2001.09.14 21:04 Maxim Sobolev wrote: > On Fri, 14 Sep 2001 18:53:28 -0700, John Merryweather Cooper wrote: > > > > On 2001.09.14 18:31 Satoshi Asami wrote: > > > This is probably a transient failure, let's hope it will build in the > > > second phase.. > > > > > > http://bento.FreeBSD.org/errorlogs/errorlogs/e.4.2001091310/bugbuddy-2.0.8.log > > > > > > Satoshi > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message > > > > > > > Adding a > > > > LIB_DEPENDS=oaf.0:${PORTSDIR}/devel/oaf > > > > would probably prevent this. > > Umm, no, bugbuddy already receives oaf dependency through USE_GNOME knob. > From > what I saw in the log I can tell that to me it looks like there is some > more > fundamental problem with bento itself, because it tries to build bugbuddy > even though one of the packages it depends upon is missed (see piece of > log > below). I have no idea why it may be happening, though. > > -Maxim > True, oaf should get included as a dependency as a result of gnomecontrolcenter->gnomevfs-> gconf->oaf indirection. But I think there maybe some subtle "timing" differences in order of build because these dependencies are arrived at indirectly. It might be interesting to see the actual order of build that bento arrives at for, say, the gnome meta-port. Might be revealing . . . > [...] > pkg_add -f bonobo-1.0.8.tgz > pkg_add: could not find package oaf-0.6.6 (proceeding anyway) > pkg_add: could not find package oaf-0.6.6 ! > pkg_add: autoload of dependency `/tmp/depends/gconf-1.0.4.tgz' failed > (proceeding anyway) > pkg_add: could not find package oaf-0.6.6 ! > pkg_add: could not find package oaf-0.6.6 ! > pkg_add: autoload of dependency `/tmp/depends/gconf-1.0.4.tgz' failed! > [...] > -- jmc MacroHard -- the perfection of form over substance, marketing over performance, and greed over design . . . To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message