From owner-freebsd-questions  Thu Feb  5 06:35:57 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id GAA27023
          for questions-outgoing; Thu, 5 Feb 1998 06:35:57 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from mylanders.com (mylanders.com [206.252.160.21])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id GAA27002
          for <questions@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu, 5 Feb 1998 06:35:52 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from nat@mylanders.com)
Received: from localhost (nat@localhost)
	by mylanders.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id IAA01734
	for <questions@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu, 5 Feb 1998 08:45:39 -0600 (CST)
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 1998 08:45:39 -0600 (CST)
From: John Frader <nat@mylanders.com>
To: FreeBSD Questions <questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject: Question-using natd for alot of machines
In-Reply-To: <19980205151245.40103@dab.iit.uni-miskolc.hu>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95q.980205084048.1720A-100000@mylanders.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG
X-To-Unsubscribe: mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org "unsubscribe questions"

Hello,

Would there any problems or concerns with using natd for 90 or more
machines?