From owner-freebsd-arch Wed Feb 14 13:23:58 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from harmony.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18BAB37B503 for ; Wed, 14 Feb 2001 13:23:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f1ELNOW91541; Wed, 14 Feb 2001 14:23:35 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Message-Id: <200102142123.f1ELNOW91541@harmony.village.org> To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Subject: Re: Proposal on shared libs version values. Cc: Peter Wemm , freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: Your message of "14 Feb 2001 12:45:30 +0100." References: <200102140444.f1E4iLU70786@mobile.wemm.org> Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2001 14:23:24 -0700 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message Dag-Erling Smorgrav writes: : Peter Wemm writes: : > As Doug Rabson so elegantly put it: The last thing we need is for people : > to waste valuable development time working around version number problems. : : Right, so why are we getting bogged down in this bikeshed? I want the : next libc version to be numbered 5.pink, btw. Somebody please just : take the patch (~des/software/stdio-20010213.diff), replace 501 with : their favorite numbering scheme, and commit it. The committed changes have problems. See my note in -current for details. Basically, we have to bump *ALL* shared libriares in -current that use std{err,out,in}. The version number has nothing to do with this :-) Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message