Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 23 Aug 2015 10:51:17 +0200
From:      Torfinn Ingolfsen <tingox@gmail.com>
To:        FreeBSD Ports ML <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Running ''portmaster ghostscript9-9.06_10'' takes a lot of time
Message-ID:  <CAJ_iqtY2fCzOpXmvzxx5Q_RvZBbMhycSEOtd6CPoasa_PHj30g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20150820202304.GA24015@server.rulingia.com>
References:  <201508200724.t7K7OPaQ033554@mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk> <627814EA5632799E98790639@atuin.in.mat.cc> <20150820150837.GL50943@over-yonder.net> <20150820202304.GA24015@server.rulingia.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 10:23 PM, Peter Jeremy <peter@rulingia.com> wrote:
>
> On my E3-1230v2 system (not a slouch), the difference is 1s to 110s -
> which is in line with Matthew's results.

Yes, this change makes ports almost unusable on FreeBSD 9.3-stable.

>
> A two-orders-of-magnitude slowdown in make startup is unreasonable and
> I formally request r394573 be backed out.  I can see the benefits of the
> functionality but the current cost is too high.


Thanks, I'll be eagerly awaiting this change.
-- 
Regards,
Torfinn Ingolfsen



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJ_iqtY2fCzOpXmvzxx5Q_RvZBbMhycSEOtd6CPoasa_PHj30g>