From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org  Sun Aug 23 08:51:20 2015
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBAAE9BFE03
 for <freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Sun, 23 Aug 2015 08:51:20 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from tingox@gmail.com)
Received: from mail-la0-x22d.google.com (mail-la0-x22d.google.com
 [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::22d])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
 Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK))
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 45009207
 for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Sun, 23 Aug 2015 08:51:20 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from tingox@gmail.com)
Received: by labjy4 with SMTP id jy4so12124312lab.3
 for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Sun, 23 Aug 2015 01:51:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
 :content-type; bh=EDoWsPpLwe8MY9pxleTw5Cjl9dVfADogTs55BBQ0+Mk=;
 b=VnP/xl0fMDmjZkSxtx42MUUvKG7w07l797l8YbYMRqHbj2jx6dNMYrSu7cAvFzrjsU
 LcE7e85uej9cPeopTnWClaEj8t4IcChNthyFFoCG+Hsr8YVWxRQE/tVFsZy0V7WCoqhp
 NovkVm2/glDaQTNByPujCUPGoqoyUpf5/3/sJMZAmv1PlhbvUwq0ORB+ewOJdeF852EF
 RzmsHD1YEq2NGs/kEERRoN99t5rWQWY215wqO3mi1lIxi4WHjEVZDVD2tKCf05ejetM1
 JFk6ADfejwCFzXrsY1CYpxoDFCZNlS3SJLlx8FQ9nPkUVge11xw3IHqU5bnNHl/+hG/7
 7o2g==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.151.6 with SMTP id um6mr14897766lbb.85.1440319877208;
 Sun, 23 Aug 2015 01:51:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.25.214.136 with HTTP; Sun, 23 Aug 2015 01:51:17 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20150820202304.GA24015@server.rulingia.com>
References: <201508200724.t7K7OPaQ033554@mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk>
 <627814EA5632799E98790639@atuin.in.mat.cc>
 <20150820150837.GL50943@over-yonder.net>
 <20150820202304.GA24015@server.rulingia.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2015 10:51:17 +0200
Message-ID: <CAJ_iqtY2fCzOpXmvzxx5Q_RvZBbMhycSEOtd6CPoasa_PHj30g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Running ''portmaster ghostscript9-9.06_10'' takes a lot of time
From: Torfinn Ingolfsen <tingox@gmail.com>
To: FreeBSD Ports ML <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2015 08:51:20 -0000

On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 10:23 PM, Peter Jeremy <peter@rulingia.com> wrote:
>
> On my E3-1230v2 system (not a slouch), the difference is 1s to 110s -
> which is in line with Matthew's results.

Yes, this change makes ports almost unusable on FreeBSD 9.3-stable.

>
> A two-orders-of-magnitude slowdown in make startup is unreasonable and
> I formally request r394573 be backed out.  I can see the benefits of the
> functionality but the current cost is too high.


Thanks, I'll be eagerly awaiting this change.
-- 
Regards,
Torfinn Ingolfsen