Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2011 09:59:43 -0500 From: "Conrad J. Sabatier" <conrads@cox.net> To: Chris Rees <crees@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: audio/amarok: make TRYBROKEN=yes reinstall worked! Message-ID: <20110827095943.7806ffd3@cox.net> In-Reply-To: <CADLo8392f6spJ_6VBjrEVrt1McL%2B5h1cfTs6rGAACX3HgykB3Q@mail.gmail.com> References: <20110827035245.7c7676a8@cox.net> <4E58B2F2.7070809@gmx.de> <4E58B770.6070802@FreeBSD.org> <20110827093707.02544428@cox.net> <CADLo8392f6spJ_6VBjrEVrt1McL%2B5h1cfTs6rGAACX3HgykB3Q@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 27 Aug 2011 15:42:09 +0100 Chris Rees <crees@freebsd.org> wrote: > On 27 August 2011 15:37, Conrad J. Sabatier <conrads@cox.net> wrote: > > On Sat, 27 Aug 2011 12:22:56 +0300 > > Andriy Gapon <avg@freebsd.org> wrote: > >> > >> I'd think that it would be sufficient to fix the reason why the > >> BROKEN line was added in the first place. > >> > > > > Perhaps not. =A0At Chris Rees' suggestion, I deinstalled ruby18 and > > tried building amarok again. =A0No dice. > > > > It seems that the paths to the ruby includes amarok's configure > > script is looking for differ in ruby19. =A0Grrrr! > > >=20 > At the risk of stating the obvious, have you tried playing with the > -I flags? Uh...not yet. I was so taken aback at how differently the two ruby ports handle the installation of their includes that I got sidetracked. :-) I'm still trying to figure out how any includes get installed at all by ruby18 (or at least, how they get registered). Nothing in the Makefile or the pkg-plist that I can see. Am I missing something? =20 --=20 Conrad J. Sabatier conrads@cox.net
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110827095943.7806ffd3>