From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 9 14:20:45 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94A3E16A4DA for ; Wed, 9 Aug 2006 14:20:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris@shenton.org) Received: from shenton.org (23.ebbed1.client.atlantech.net [209.190.235.35]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9684743D49 for ; Wed, 9 Aug 2006 14:20:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chris@shenton.org) Received: (qmail 26144 invoked by uid 1001); 9 Aug 2006 14:20:41 -0000 From: Chris Shenton To: Nagy L?szl? References: <44D79242.3050108@enternet.hu> <20060807231202.GA9552@epia2.farid-hajji.net> Date: Wed, 09 Aug 2006 10:20:41 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20060807231202.GA9552@epia2.farid-hajji.net> (cpghost@cordula.ws's message of "Tue, 8 Aug 2006 01:12:02 +0200") Message-ID: <86hd0mdm86.fsf@Bacalao.shenton.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Thin terminals for FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Aug 2006 14:20:45 -0000 cpghost writes: > I'm using EPIA 5000 mini-ATX boards with 512 MB RAM, diskless booting > from an NFS server. They load X.org and everything else on demand. > Compared to local HDDs, there's a small performance hit when loading > programs [and those boards are not the fastest, though 100% silent ;-)], > but users here are happy enough with them. Ditto: I have one of these in my kitchen and like it -- no sysadm, silent, etc. Not the fastest but mine is 3 years old. Only problem I've noticed is if Mozilla (or whatever) uses all the RAM then X11 restarts, losing your sessions. Doesn't happen all the time. One day I'll set up swap to run over the net. I really like the fact that I install stuff like Mozilla and other software on one box (the server) and its immediately available around the house on the rest of the boxes. The less sysadm I do the better. >> - Do I need to use gigabit ethernet? Or is it enough to use a normal 100 >> Mbps wired network? I heard that there can be bandwidth problems when >> using many terminals, but I do not have experience. > > For a diskless setup, 100 MB switched on the client side is enough; but > you'd definitely prefer gigabit ethernet on the NFS server. I'm using switched 100Mbps ether but I only have the one diskless client. I have a couple other clients mounting just some of the filesystems over the net and would prefer GigE but it's not bad as it is. I'd definitely do this diskless thing if I had 10-20 client terminals to set up, like in an internet cafe or something. If they get wedged, who cares: just power-cycle them. :-)