Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 20 Nov 2009 11:14:01 -0800
From:      Marcel Moolenaar <xcllnt@mac.com>
To:        Anton Shterenlikht <mexas@bristol.ac.uk>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, freebsd-ia64@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: open64 fbsd port?
Message-ID:  <E8B59B1B-F179-4B41-8AE7-9754B46877FC@mac.com>
In-Reply-To: <20091120170132.GA62790@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk>
References:  <20091120164741.GA59827@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <20091120170132.GA62790@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help

On Nov 20, 2009, at 9:01 AM, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:

> On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 04:47:41PM +0000, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
>> Is there a fbsd port of open64 (http://www.open64.net/),
>> or any branched project?
>> 
>> In particular there is a mention of ORC (http://ipf-orc.sourceforge.net/)
>> specifically for ia64, but the pages are very out of date.
>> 
>> And then there's something called Aurora, which seems to be the same
>> as ORC (http://sourceforge.net/projects/ipf-orc/), but also *very*
>> out of date.
> 
> And also there is OpenUH, primarilily for ia64, but linux:
> 
> OpenUH 	Source code,
> 	IA-64, Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS release 3 and gcc 3.x
> 	  	openuh-alpha.src.tar.gz  	90.2 MB

Looks like a branch off of Open64.

> 
> and Path64 (http://www.path64.com/)

I don't believe Path64 has an ia64 backend (it's optimized for amd64),
but that may be pulled from Open64. I think Path64 may be a better
investment than Open64 (for FreeBSD), if the project is more open...

> I understand no fbsd ports for these compilers exist yet?

Correct.

-- 
Marcel Moolenaar
xcllnt@mac.com






Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?E8B59B1B-F179-4B41-8AE7-9754B46877FC>