Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 1 Dec 1997 17:53:41 +0000
From:      Josef Karthauser <joe@pavilion.net>
To:        Satoshi Asami <asami@cs.berkeley.edu>
Subject:   A change in the way we port perl anyone?
Message-ID:  <19971201175341.20837@pavilion.net>
Resent-Message-ID: <199712021806.SAA05079@florence.pavilion.net>
In-Reply-To: <199711231601.IAA22224@baloon.mimi.com>; from Satoshi Asami on Sun, Nov 23, 1997 at 08:01:47AM -0800
References:  <Pine.BSF.3.96.971122204135.14432a-100000@picnic.mat.net> <199711231601.IAA22224@baloon.mimi.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On Sun, Nov 23, 1997 at 08:01:47AM -0800, Satoshi Asami wrote:
>  * I _WISH_ that there had been a p5 category made, because without that,
>  * it's really hard not to do duplicates on Perl stuff.  There too darn many!
> 
> There is a "perl5" virtual category.  It shows up in the ports index
> page and ports/INDEX. :)
> 
> Satoshi

Why don't we integrate the p5 stuff with mod-CPAN.  The perl code
changes so often and they've already got an update mechanism for their stuff.
Seems like we're reinventing the wheel, badly, here.

Comments?
Joe
-- 
Josef Karthauser        
Technical Manager       Email: joe@pavilion.net
Pavilion Internet plc.  [Tel: +44 1273 607072  Fax: +44 1273 607073]




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19971201175341.20837>