From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 15 13:20:13 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CB0C106564A for ; Sun, 15 Apr 2012 13:20:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 772478FC12 for ; Sun, 15 Apr 2012 13:20:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q3FDKDaf060750 for ; Sun, 15 Apr 2012 13:20:13 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q3FDKDfr060749; Sun, 15 Apr 2012 13:20:13 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2012 13:20:13 GMT Message-Id: <201204151320.q3FDKDfr060749@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Michael Scheidell Cc: Subject: Re: ports/166313: please, update net-mgmt/zabbix-server to 1.8.11 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Michael Scheidell List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2012 13:20:13 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/166313; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Michael Scheidell To: Cc: Subject: Re: ports/166313: please, update net-mgmt/zabbix-server to 1.8.11 Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2012 09:13:33 -0400 Jim: Thanks for maintaining zabbix-server. Your help keeping FreeBSD updated is appreciated! the actual patch part of your fix didn't actually get attached (normal MIME attachment), or, more likely, GNATS mangled it. if using command line tools? can you 'reply' to that pr with the patch attached? I would do something like: elm -A zabbix-server-1.8.11,2.patch -s 'Re: ports/166313: please, update net-mgmt/zabbix-server to 1.8.11' bug-followup@FreeBSD.org (mutt, or, if using gui based tools, maybe disable PGP signature. seems GNATS mungs emails with PGP signature) its important to do that, even though many (very sr ) committers might be able to pull a raw patch from the pr, as you see, your patch has been sitting here since march 28th. Give a shot at trying to attach the patch the the pr reply, and see if it shows up as a patch, not an inline email. -- Michael Scheidell, CTO >*| * SECNAP Network Security Corporation d: +1.561.948.2259 w: http://people.freebsd.org/~scheidell