From owner-freebsd-bugs Wed Feb 25 06:30:03 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id GAA20714 for freebsd-bugs-outgoing; Wed, 25 Feb 1998 06:30:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id GAA20690; Wed, 25 Feb 1998 06:30:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 1998 06:30:02 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199802251430.GAA20690@hub.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs Cc: From: Max Euston Subject: RE: bin/5838: Make more(1) use LINES= and COLUMNS= environment variables. Reply-To: Max Euston Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR bin/5838; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Max Euston To: "'Bill Fenner'" Cc: "FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org" Subject: RE: bin/5838: Make more(1) use LINES= and COLUMNS= environment variables. Date: Wed, 25 Feb 1998 09:20:28 -0500 On Tuesday, February 24, 1998 5:30 PM, Bill Fenner [SMTP:fenner@parc.xerox.com] wrote: > meuston@jmrodgers.com wrote: > > - more(1) does not work with arbitrary screen sizes (like in a > > telnet session from Win-95) and has no way to specify the screen > > size without generating a new terminfo definition. > > Have you tried "stty cols X rows Y"? > > Bill > Oh great! :-( another useless change - I wonder why it wasn't caught in the discussion on "hackers"? :-) I have never run into that option of stty. Since the other part of the change is still good ('help' does not pause after displaying it's screen), would you think that it is better to retract and resubmit this PR with the LINES and COLUMNS changes removed, or just leave them in as another (redundant) way of doing the same thing? (Feeling a little sheepish). Max ----- Max Euston Sysadm, Programmer, etc... To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message