Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2002 17:30:26 -0600 From: Brett Glass <brett@lariat.org> To: Miguel Mendez <flynn@energyhq.homeip.net> Cc: Danny Howard <dannyman@toldme.com>, Cy Schubert - CITS Open Systems Group <Cy.Schubert@uumail.gov.bc.ca>, freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Baby(1) Message-ID: <4.3.2.7.2.20020408172633.00e00610@nospam.lariat.org> In-Reply-To: <20020408213459.A53828@energyhq.homeip.net> References: <4.3.2.7.2.20020408110809.0382e4d0@nospam.lariat.org> <200204060500.g3650sM84275@cwsys.cwsent.com> <200204060500.g3650sM84275@cwsys.cwsent.com> <20020406145354.D17676@pianosa.catch22.org> <4.3.2.7.2.20020408110809.0382e4d0@nospam.lariat.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 01:34 PM 4/8/2002, Miguel Mendez wrote: >Anyway, most sysadmins prefer sex(6) when under a debugger in order to >avoid undesirable baby(1) forks :) A rubber baby buggy debugger? ;-) Ether that, or they make sure that vasprintf(3) is redirected to /dev/null. --Brett To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4.3.2.7.2.20020408172633.00e00610>