Date: Sun, 07 Nov 1999 11:12:49 -0800 From: Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au> To: "Daniel C. Sobral" <dcs@newsguy.com> Cc: Thierry Herbelot <herbelot@cybercable.fr>, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: stuck with ~year old current Message-ID: <199911071912.LAA13326@dingo.cdrom.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 07 Nov 1999 21:16:32 %2B0900." <38256DA0.F684B854@newsguy.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > > "We do not support upgrading to -current from anything else than the > > > latest -stable." > > > > Does this still hold after the recent signal changes ? > > > > TfH > > > > (I assume Yes, if one first upgrade the kernel, then the world) > > You assume correctly. -stable loader can load -current kernel. Well, > it could until very recently. I don't know if the new stuff Mike is > doing will introduce any incompatibility. The last incompatibility was around March or so, when the load address of the kernel changed. Anything postdating that is basically equi-functional. -- \\ Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day. \\ Mike Smith \\ Tell him he should learn how to fish himself, \\ msmith@freebsd.org \\ and he'll hate you for a lifetime. \\ msmith@cdrom.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199911071912.LAA13326>