From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 1 01:57:00 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EC8A16A41B; Sat, 1 Sep 2007 01:57:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joao@matik.com.br) Received: from msrv.matik.com.br (msrv.matik.com.br [200.152.83.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9B4D13C469; Sat, 1 Sep 2007 01:56:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joao@matik.com.br) Received: from ap-h.matik.com.br (ap-h.matik.com.br [200.152.83.36]) by msrv.matik.com.br (8.14.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l811unt7000913; Fri, 31 Aug 2007 22:56:49 -0300 (BRT) (envelope-from joao@matik.com.br) From: JoaoBR Organization: Infomatik To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 22:56:59 -0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <-3502020561049594852@unknownmsgid> <200708312226.26977.joao@matik.com.br> <20070901013733.GA12544@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> In-Reply-To: <20070901013733.GA12544@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200708312257.00730.joao@matik.com.br> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.90.3, clamav-milter version 0.90.3 on msrv.matik.com.br X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: Roman Divacky , pluknet , Steve Kargl , Bj?rn K?nig Subject: Re: Adding k9 and k10 to bsd.cpu.mk X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Sep 2007 01:57:00 -0000 On Friday 31 August 2007 22:37:33 Steve Kargl wrote: > On Fri, Aug 31, 2007 at 10:26:25PM -0300, JoaoBR wrote: > > On Friday 31 August 2007 21:20:30 JoaoBR wrote: > > > > > opterons are not easy but it is already kind of advanced cpu so > > > > > could be > > > > > > > > Why are Opteron's any harder? > > > > > > because all of them are 64bit but some older ones are not SSE3 capabl= e, > > > < 250 I guess now but 252 is but not 100% sure > > > > so just a thought, I have no not-sse3 capable anymore so I could check= =20 > > but asking the gcc guys here ... > > > > what if I try to compile with -msse3 and it is not available, does it go > > through or do I get invalid compile option and if it go through what may > > it cost? > > Yes, it will compile the code. The result will most likely not run > if some code was translated to use a sse3 feature. well,question is: will this kernel boot and/or will it crash because of thi= s=20 cmppile options -msse3 - or not? =2D-=20 Jo=E3o A mensagem foi scaneada pelo sistema de e-mail e pode ser considerada segura. Service fornecido pelo Datacenter Matik https://datacenter.matik.com.br