Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2006 16:10:04 +0200 From: Benjamin Lutz <benlutz@datacomm.ch> To: "Yuri Grebenkin" <breath@unix.net> Cc: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why is not more FreeBSD software writ Message-ID: <200604161610.08089.benlutz@datacomm.ch> In-Reply-To: <auto-000000094533@mtsnet.ru> References: <auto-000000094533@mtsnet.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--nextPart1511785.EmN7QK4Ix9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Sunday 16 April 2006 17:04, Yuri Grebenkin wrote: > [...] > By the way, one can realize OOP-model in C better than in C++ if needed. That is an interesting statement. I see how you can simulate OOP in C, but = can=20 you explain how one could realize it better than with C++? Cheers Benjamin --nextPart1511785.EmN7QK4Ix9 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBEQlBAgShs4qbRdeQRAnfMAJwOJtmwTMjTbB50XOIOb2MRXGpZXwCZARSb lMpYhYkJAOuahmfWdkTasfs= =M5FT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1511785.EmN7QK4Ix9--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200604161610.08089.benlutz>