Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 17:32:23 -0800 From: Tim Kientzle <tim@kientzle.com> To: Ian Lepore <freebsd@damnhippie.dyndns.org> Cc: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: arm/174461: [patch] Fix off-by-one in arm9/arm10 cache maintenance routines Message-ID: <BA559B08-053C-469F-BFF2-A4AB258DE698@kientzle.com> In-Reply-To: <1355603099.1198.87.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> References: <201212151957.qBFJvdUo044496@revolution.hippie.lan> <CAJ-Vmok5756P=iDVUze%2BBo%2B7FBBMWz0918ypk2=0qnoJkT_7jg@mail.gmail.com> <1355603099.1198.87.camel@revolution.hippie.lan>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Dec 15, 2012, at 12:24 PM, Ian Lepore wrote: > On Sat, 2012-12-15 at 12:08 -0800, Adrian Chadd wrote: >> Wow, cool. What family CPU is in the pandaboard and r-pi? >>=20 >> Would you be able to review the earlier ARM support and see if = similar >> issues exist there? >>=20 >> Thanks! >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >> Adrian >>=20 >>=20 >> On 15 December 2012 11:57, Ian Lepore <freebsd@damnhippie.dyndns.org> = wrote: >>>=20 >>>> Number: 174461 >=20 > This *is* the earlier ARM support. The pandaboard and r-pi are arm = v7. Slight correction: Pandaboard is armv7 (Cortex-A9) RaspberryPi is armv6 (arm11) Tim=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?BA559B08-053C-469F-BFF2-A4AB258DE698>