From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 5 18:13:23 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D578416A421 for ; Thu, 5 Jul 2007 18:13:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from maxsec@gmail.com) Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com (wr-out-0506.google.com [64.233.184.238]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 930CC13C4C3 for ; Thu, 5 Jul 2007 18:13:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from maxsec@gmail.com) Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i23so349370wra for ; Thu, 05 Jul 2007 11:13:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=ofaZMUjLCE6m6HRtrYV9/YEfz8DUF6IVhOr3JvdQY7PonGhVuw/ugbLNqtI8tqYkikJVwewa++2rYvjHifaF8FPiWPnzheafYgfv5jS4tnmDodu3n5SDYzdZRVRieSuwsWTYCBklUOxmk4z8ZkasZ0pm9DJdG7GeUAoKIgxK5Gk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=TRn80+VkTo5CiSz7yL0nV1A3sTcTtjFVl9Mh7wENrKoJcekzgaGKuNm6Nagwac6JPXvmoLZXZ54kTWYJHZglNCoEqHjV7F0+iE6upZAcsbt9nmSsrHa029Z1Xp0WqXHMpwR6ITbgBZ1XTB3tkhZk/j3kkWsx57IqId61euPcCtg= Received: by 10.142.191.2 with SMTP id o2mr598732wff.1183659202228; Thu, 05 Jul 2007 11:13:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.80.2 with HTTP; Thu, 5 Jul 2007 11:13:22 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <72cf361e0707051113v366e8b36ufd68c1d6aba9abc1@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 19:13:22 +0100 From: "Martin Hepworth" To: "Tek Bahadur Limbu" In-Reply-To: <20070705192251.3ba0abb3.teklimbu@wlink.com.np> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20070705192251.3ba0abb3.teklimbu@wlink.com.np> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bge NIC not supporting 1000baseTX X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2007 18:13:24 -0000 HI is the other end auto-negotiating properly? What happens if you force 1000 full at BOTH ends? -- martin On 7/5/07, Tek Bahadur Limbu wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi all, > > I have a problem with my bge0 (BCM5750A1 NetXtreme) NIC card which is > integrated in my Dell 600SC machine. This machine is running on > FreeBSD-6.2 (i386). > > For some reasons, the bge0 NIC interface does not seem to support > 1000baseTX settings. > > When the NIC card is set at either 10/100 baseTX, the bge0 interface > shows an active state. However, when I type the following command: > > ifconfig bge0 media 1000baseTX > > the status of the bge0 NIC card shows: no carrier > > Does that mean that this bge0 NIC card does not support speeds of > 1000baseTX or do I have to tweak some kernel or sysctl settings? > > Thanking you.... > > > - -- > > > With best regards and good wishes, > > Yours sincerely, > > Tek Bahadur Limbu > > (TAG/TDG Group) > Jwl Systems Department > > Worldlink Communications Pvt. Ltd. > > Jawalakhel, Nepal > > http://www.wlink.com.np > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (FreeBSD) > > iD8DBQFGjPQvVrOl+eVhOvYRAtEsAKCni1JJ/mBLLOnSroIajz6vO+gwTACdE22N > W2fd6dj7OunY/1r5PaZkLMs= > =HGVA > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >