From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Aug  5 11:12:49 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7CA4FB08
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Tue,  5 Aug 2014 11:12:49 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6406627AE
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Tue,  5 Aug 2014 11:12:49 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118])
 by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.8/8.14.8) with ESMTP id s75BCnvu059353
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Tue, 5 Aug 2014 11:12:49 GMT
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject: [Bug 192382] new_xorg pkg repository for 9.3 doesnt contain new
 version of ATI drivers
Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2014 11:12:49 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports Tree
X-Bugzilla-Component: Infrastructure
X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People
X-Bugzilla-Who: pete@twisted.org.uk
X-Bugzilla-Status: Needs Triage
X-Bugzilla-Priority: ---
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-192382-13-O2mflqyqdC@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-192382-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-192382-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: Ports bug reports <freebsd-ports-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2014 11:12:49 -0000

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192382

--- Comment #2 from pete@twisted.org.uk ---
yes, the repo can only have old or new - but thats the reaosn for having two
repos. There is the standard one which contains the "old" ports, and the extra
repo for new_corg users specificly only containing the afected ports which need
to be compiled with "NEW_XORG" set. That why you need to configure a second
repo if you are using new_xorg.

The repo for "new" xorg does copntain the new packages for all of the other
bits of X11, but this one was apparently missed. If you could pass on to X11
then that would be great - I dont think I have misiunderstood the reason for
having the two repositories, and it could be fixed fairly easily I believe.

thanks!

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.