Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 13 Sep 1999 19:02:43 +1000 (EST)
From:      Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
To:        Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai <asmodai@wxs.nl>
Cc:        current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: profiling on kernels
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.4.10.9909131859210.23746-100000@alphplex.bde.org>
In-Reply-To: <19990913074343.B89309@daemon.ninth-circle.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> >More complete patches ahve already been applied to -current:
> >
> >RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/i386/isa/prof_machdep.c,v
> >Working file: prof_machdep.c
> >head: 1.14
> 
> I checked, I do have rev 1.14 in place and it borks.
> 
> How far off is the chance of -p going haywire with some kernel options?

Not large.  I run regression tests on GENERIC and LINT (config -pp) on
most days.  Profiling hasn't caused any compile-time problems for several
months (-pp is only broken at runtime).

Bruce



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.10.9909131859210.23746-100000>