Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 6 Jun 2010 14:30:53 +0300
From:      "Reko Turja" <reko.turja@liukuma.net>
To:        "Matthew Seaman" <m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk>, <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: freebsd releases?!?!?!(confused)
Message-ID:  <40CB37DD3E994EA1BBEB55E30E9398DD@rivendell>
In-Reply-To: <4C0B8074.8070004@infracaninophile.co.uk>
References:  <AANLkTilEBUW9ybjB0EiwlFzPLGVK8QreXDJPJKnTN3hX@mail.gmail.com> <4C0B8074.8070004@infracaninophile.co.uk>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--------------------------------------------------
From: "Matthew Seaman" <m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk>
Sent: Sunday, June 06, 2010 2:03 PM
To: <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: freebsd releases?!?!?!(confused)

> STABLE is a development branch: it's called 'STABLE' because it is
> expected to run stably.  STABLE generally receives continual fixes=20
> and
> updates, but these will previously have been tested in the bleeding=20
> edge
Isn't STABLE called stable, because the featureset and kernel=20
interface is set, the term has nothing to do with stableness of the OS=20
itself. Running STABLE is equal to running beta, use at your own risk.

-Reko=20




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?40CB37DD3E994EA1BBEB55E30E9398DD>