From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 1 02:08:23 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B2ED16A41B; Sat, 1 Sep 2007 02:08:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joao@matik.com.br) Received: from msrv.matik.com.br (msrv.matik.com.br [200.152.83.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1BC013C465; Sat, 1 Sep 2007 02:08:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joao@matik.com.br) Received: from ap-h.matik.com.br (ap-h.matik.com.br [200.152.83.36]) by msrv.matik.com.br (8.14.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l8128DKg001633; Fri, 31 Aug 2007 23:08:13 -0300 (BRT) (envelope-from joao@matik.com.br) From: JoaoBR Organization: Infomatik To: obrien@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Roman Divacky , pluknet , =?iso-8859-1?q?Bj=F6rn_K=F6nig?= Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 23:08:24 -0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <-3502020561049594852@unknownmsgid> <200708312120.31912.joao@matik.com.br> <20070901014323.GA41683@dragon.NUXI.org> In-Reply-To: <20070901014323.GA41683@dragon.NUXI.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200708312308.25372.joao@matik.com.br> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.90.3, clamav-milter version 0.90.3 on msrv.matik.com.br X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: Subject: Re: Adding k9 and k10 to bsd.cpu.mk X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Sep 2007 02:08:23 -0000 On Friday 31 August 2007 22:43:23 David O'Brien wrote: > On Fri, Aug 31, 2007 at 09:20:30PM -0300, JoaoBR wrote: > > On Friday 31 August 2007 21:07:10 David O'Brien wrote: > > > > opterons are not easy but it is already kind of advanced cpu so > > > > could be > > > > > > Why are Opteron's any harder? > > > > because all of them are 64bit but some older ones are not SSE3 capable,= < > > 250 I guess now but 252 is but not 100% sure > > It's not Opteron model # specific - but silicon revision specific. > There are rev C0 model 250's, along with rev CG, and rev E. > less than rev.E support SEE3 ? Do you have a spec/link for that? > Same for athlon64 - older ones don't support SSE3, newer ones do. > like I said before 'older ones' is kind of lame def > > people 'kind of familiarly' with reading manuals and specs are already > > having difficulties here so imagin an average user (unkndefspec) who > > likes to optimize his kernel (his cpu's kernel of course :) ) > > > > so as far as there are a cpu options for a freebsd kernel they should > > be understandable so it might be worse thinking well before doing > > (=3Dless support =3D less questions =3D less problemas) > > BTW, the AMD offically sanctioned spelling for GCC 'march' is "amdfam10" I guess you agree without any objections that that this 'is 100% userfriend= ly'=20 and could by add as '100% userfriendly' and so then I agree as well ...=20 but ... will they print it on the box in order to see it ??? guess not ;) =2D-=20 Jo=E3o A mensagem foi scaneada pelo sistema de e-mail e pode ser considerada segura. Service fornecido pelo Datacenter Matik https://datacenter.matik.com.br