From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 24 16:22:27 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (unknown [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8347D1065670 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 16:22:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-wy0-f182.google.com (mail-wy0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D4798FC1D for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 16:22:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyg24 with SMTP id 24so335976wyg.13 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 09:22:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:x-mailer:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=ca8pMhf9onTl71jEF3Hbukv7FPkE970axyLI5Ovb4Jo=; b=VBWOCvtWGF9v3XiDiz1IYOG/AMpqYvZY0h8uemDkNk3zMh1w2FNqnlAgHMlKI+1TqY 9nELVNcvDg51sX/EADAcMWda6D+zDMH0O96fWSiF1FMLZR7YyK13jbWf8aBv/ZHoASkL 01sXUBiRyabNhU5B8t9F8nRsJdeXB6Z7liReQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=i+ljNxKjCRHlumCBLOvzwenLt055+zwcZ/lHS7V5I8SYfj2Ysw5EOixIbiTYEP8qjk /iJi1pRHKuVwi9kW1m7Wue0mmYFKE2SORYy6feA6PSlbbeZMvGJNWfaVmAPQD2InNOkK JcacvISdx3qw5hfH8a1aeXKMCkbB5J2VG6Q64= Received: by 10.216.235.22 with SMTP id t22mr820165weq.89.1308932545904; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 09:22:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com (87-194-105-247.bethere.co.uk [87.194.105.247]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id fm6sm2119276wbb.61.2011.06.24.09.22.23 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 24 Jun 2011 09:22:24 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 17:22:21 +0100 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20110624172221.137a8331@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20110624051018.320540@gmx.com> <86k4cbnv2u.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.9 (GTK+ 2.22.1; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Installing X11 gives perl version conflict X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 16:22:27 -0000 On Fri, 24 Jun 2011 11:20:46 -0400 Michael Powell wrote: > Read /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.perl.mk. I think mostly many of the variables > contained within may be set in /etc/make.conf and can be picked up at > build time by make. Particularly interesting were PERL_VERSION, > PERL_PORT, and USE_PERL, for example. Reading down into the contents > will point to how the variables get used. I don't think any of this is very relevant - except as general background . The problem as I see it is that he is installing packages that aren't built from the same tree. One of the dependencies of xf86-video-fbdev-0.4.2 was built when perl 5.10 was the default and one after the default switched to perl 5.12. If building isn't an option then it's better to stick to one release trees at a time. That still leave the problem to dealing with vulnerabilities as best you can, but there is not a simple answer.