Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 12:51:16 +0300 From: Peter Pentchev <roam@ringlet.net> To: Fernando Schapachnik <fernando@mecon.gov.ar> Cc: Patrick Baker <PBaker@outpost.com> Subject: Re: How do fix a good solution against spam.. Message-ID: <20040514095116.GA977@straylight.m.ringlet.net> In-Reply-To: <20040514114059.GD306@bal740r0.mecon.gov.ar> References: <777BCABEE522D5119E3E00508B6CA0B802E9AA95@CYBHQMSX05> <20040514114059.GD306@bal740r0.mecon.gov.ar>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--HlL+5n6rz5pIUxbD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1251 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 08:40:59AM -0300, Fernando Schapachnik wrote: > As everybody is throwing in their favorite anti-spam solutions, here's mi= ne: >=20 > http://www.paganini.net/ask/ Ah, something similar to TMDA? For another point of view on that kind of software, check e.g. Jeremy Zawodny's experience and some of the readers' comments: http://jeremy.zawodny.com/blog/archives/001931.html I'm not saying it's all bad _if_implemented_correctly_, just.. sometimes it's good to know both sides of a story ;) G'luck, Peter --=20 Peter Pentchev roam@ringlet.net roam@sbnd.net roam@FreeBSD.org PGP key: http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roam/roam.key.asc Key fingerprint FDBA FD79 C26F 3C51 C95E DF9E ED18 B68D 1619 4553 This inert sentence is my body, but my soul is alive, dancing in the sparks= of your brain. --HlL+5n6rz5pIUxbD Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFApJaU7Ri2jRYZRVMRAqMxAKCkErf+5vI/h+qKcr4gfk611dcaJwCeOYif U9e3kLLn0+J507cfjf0EDtQ= =Lg// -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --HlL+5n6rz5pIUxbD--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040514095116.GA977>