From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Jun 13 4:15: 5 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mail.surf1.de (mail.surf1.de [194.25.165.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76E4937BB29 for ; Tue, 13 Jun 2000 04:14:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from alex@big.endian.de) Received: from neutron.cichlids.com (p3E9C1135.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [62.156.17.53]) by mail.surf1.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA04501 for ; Tue, 13 Jun 2000 13:14:46 +0200 Received: from cichlids.cichlids.com (cichlids.cichlids.com [192.168.0.10]) by neutron.cichlids.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7218BAC30 for ; Tue, 13 Jun 2000 13:14:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cichlids.cichlids.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 0657014A69; Tue, 13 Jun 2000 13:15:00 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2000 13:14:59 +0200 From: Alexander Langer To: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: sigaction.2 manpage: mcontext_t or ucontext_t? Message-ID: <20000613131459.C3264@cichlids.cichlids.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i X-PGP-Fingerprint: 44 28 CA 4C 46 5B D3 A8 A8 E3 BA F3 4E 60 7D 7F X-PGP-at: finger alex@big.endian.de X-Verwirrung: Dieser Header dient der allgemeinen Verwirrung. Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hello! docs/17863 claims: The description of the third argument to signal handlers if SA_SIGINFO is supplied is wrong. It's a ucontext_t, not an mcontext_t. It wants to change: The context argument to a POSIX SA_SIGINFO handler points to an - instance of mcontext_t. to The context argument to a POSIX SA_SIGINFO handler points to an + instance of ucontext_t. I myself think - from reading source - that this is true, but I'm not quite sure. I want someone who has clue to verify this :) Thanks in advance! Alex -- cat: /home/alex/.sig: No such file or directory To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message