Date: Sun, 14 Mar 1999 19:41:19 -0500 (EST) From: Joseph Scott <joseph@randomnetworks.com> To: Andreas Klemm <andreas@klemm.gtn.com> Cc: freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG, de-bsd-chat@DE.FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FreeBSD 3.1 SMP outperforms SuSE 6.0 SMP by factor 2.3 !!! Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9903141938270.10542-100000@sonic.digital-web.net> In-Reply-To: <19990315001521.A39079@titan.klemm.gtn.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 15 Mar 1999, Andreas Klemm wrote: > See the links in my signature ... > > Enjoy it ... Linux brings 0% performance gain in the "stable" system > SMP arena ...... I took a quick look and it's eat to have some numbers with these features. I'm not likely to get my hands on multiproc. machines so I was hoping that someone would do something like this. Would it be possible for you to run the same tests with the 2.2 kernel? I would think that regardless of the label ( "stable", "current", etc ) the 2.2 kernel would be the one most people would put up against FBSD 3.1 > > -- > Andreas Klemm http://www.FreeBSD.ORG/~andreas > News : FreeBSD 3.1 SMP outperforms SuSE Linux 6.0 SMP by 230% !!! > See : http://www.freebsd.org/~andreas/benches/index.html > http://www.FreeBSD.ORG/~fsmp/SMP/akgraph-a/graph1.html > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message > Joseph Scott joseph@randomnetworks.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.10.9903141938270.10542-100000>