Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 17:06:57 +0000 From: RW <fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6.2: ULE vs 4BSD Message-ID: <200611261706.57754.fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <cb5206420611260418h70415e4buc807f001e9b0c9da@mail.gmail.com> References: <499c70c0611260212sa53a2bcq6345f063b7bfdddf@mail.gmail.com> <cb5206420611260418h70415e4buc807f001e9b0c9da@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sunday 26 November 2006 12:18, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: > On 11/26/06, John Smith <almarrie@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hello, > > > > What shall I use as a scheduler on it? 4BSD or ULE? > > The general consensus is you should not touch ULE unless > you're a developer willing to fix some outstanding issues and > maybe take active maintainership of it. I think that's a bit strong. I've used both, off and on, on my Desktop machine and not seen any real difference.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200611261706.57754.fbsd06>