From owner-freebsd-current  Thu Mar  5 20:30:02 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id UAA22199
          for freebsd-current-outgoing; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 20:30:02 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from home.dragondata.com (toasty@home.dragondata.com [204.137.237.2])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id UAA22143;
          Thu, 5 Mar 1998 20:29:51 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from toasty@home.dragondata.com)
Received: (from toasty@localhost)
	by home.dragondata.com (8.8.8/8.8.5) id WAA22909;
	Thu, 5 Mar 1998 22:29:28 -0600 (CST)
From: Kevin Day <toasty@home.dragondata.com>
Message-Id: <199803060429.WAA22909@home.dragondata.com>
Subject: Re: Donations.
In-Reply-To: <19980305215754.02721@mcs.net> from Karl Denninger at "Mar 5, 98 09:57:54 pm"
To: karl@mcs.net (Karl Denninger)
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 1998 22:29:10 -0600 (CST)
Cc: dyson@FreeBSD.ORG, shimon@simon-shapiro.org, current@FreeBSD.ORG,
        jak@cetlink.net, karpen@ocean.campus.luth.se
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL31 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

> I don't know if there has been any recent breakage.... does anyone else have
> any serious (ie: heavy-duty) experience in this area that can speak to
> whether the -CURRENT tree, as it exists now, is ok in the NFS server area?

I've played with it a bit.

nfsd under 2.2.5 is stable as a rock.

nfsd under -current croaks under heavy load.

Trying to backup my -current server over nfs to a slow tape drive can kill
it, easily. Usually it's the 'console is still responsive, but all processes
are hung.' situation.


Kevin

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message