Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 09:46:20 +1000 From: Norberto Meijome <freebsd@meijome.net> To: "Aryeh M. Friedman" <aryeh.friedman@gmail.com> Cc: Predrag Punosevac <punosevac@math.arizona.edu>, questions@freebsd.org, Francisco Reyes <lists@stringsutils.com> Subject: Re: best way to run vista inside freebsd Message-ID: <20071025094620.5dbed027@meijome.net> In-Reply-To: <471ECC56.60104@gmail.com> References: <47179FB5.60606@flosoft-systems.com> <4717DA89.4080502@math.arizona.edu> <20071019141331.7f5e37a8@meijome.net> <cone.1193201170.18381.72027.1000@zoraida.natserv.net> <471ECC56.60104@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 24 Oct 2007 00:38:46 -0400
"Aryeh M. Friedman" <aryeh.friedman@gmail.com> wrote:
> Francisco Reyes wrote:
> > Norberto Meijome writes:
> >
> >>> I do not have Windows on any of my machines but I have heard that
> >>> Win4BSD is really good. It is not free! I believe it is about
> >>> $45.
> >>
> >> $45 is far cheaper than EMC's VMWare workstation edition. Does it
> >> support Vista
> >> now? interesting..you can also try QEMu, on which Win4BSD is partly
> >> based .
> >
> > Win4BSD is not all that stable and the support is rather lacking. You
> > see many posts in their forums with no answer.. and others with
> > answers weeks/months later.
>
> besides it doesn't work on amd64
I didnt know all this. thanks! QEMu will have to keep working for now ;)
btw, does QEMU work ok under 64bit?
B
_________________________
{Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome
Law of Conservation of Perversity:
we can't make something simpler without making something else more complex
I speak for myself, not my employer. Contents may be hot. Slippery when wet. Reading disclaimers makes you go blind. Writing them is worse. You have been Warned.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20071025094620.5dbed027>