From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 25 06:20:40 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C432F37B401 for ; Fri, 25 Jul 2003 06:20:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from shiva.warpcore.org (shiva.warpcore.org [208.2.70.212]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 188F843F3F for ; Fri, 25 Jul 2003 06:20:40 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from drevil@warpcore.org) Received: from [65.26.140.154] (CPE-65-26-140-154.kc.rr.com [65.26.140.154]) by shiva.warpcore.org (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h6PDKcdv019957 for ; Fri, 25 Jul 2003 08:20:39 -0500 From: Shawn To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <3F20DA91.4065447F@mindspring.com> References: <000001c3521a$7fa912c0$6bd4bfac@AlHindawi> <3F20DA91.4065447F@mindspring.com> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: http://drevil.warpcore.org/ Message-Id: <1059139238.50681.0.camel@CPE-65-26-140-154.kc.rr.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.3 Date: 25 Jul 2003 08:20:38 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Memory Mangement Problem in 5.1-RELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2003 13:20:41 -0000 On Fri, 2003-07-25 at 02:21, Terry Lambert wrote: > You probably can't get away with the old gcc, since the binary > format changed For No Good Reason(tm). Didn't the GNU people say they had to change it to be more ABI compliant with the 'standard'? -- Shawn http://drevil.warpcore.org/